About the Project

Network Partner
Network Directory
Human Centred Systems
Research

Conferences and Workshops

Latest
Discussion
Knowledge Library

Postgraduate
Related Links
EU Links
Photo Gallery
 
 
AI and Society- Summaries of papers to be published

AI and Society Summaries of papers to be published

Information and Communication Technologies: Perspectives and their Impact on Society
Dietrich Brandt and Klaus Henning

Notes for a critical reflection on Emilia-Romagna and Bologna
Francesco Garibaldo

KNOWLEDGE NETWORKING IN CROSS CULTURAL SETTINGS
Karamjit S Gill

Networks of Science and Technology in India: The Elite and The Subaltern Streams
Dr. Ashok Jain

Entrepreneurial Innovations in Gujarat
Dhawal Mehta and Bhalchandra Joshi

Learning Organisations-The Process of Innovation and Technological Change
V.P.Kharbanda

Entrepreneurial Spirit of the Indian Farmer
Kavita Mehra

Role of Universities in IT Education in India
Abhai Mansingh

An Indigenous process of pedagogic innovation: a case study on curriculum development
Pratibha Jolly

Convergence, the University of the Future and the Future of the University
David Smith

Multimedia Archiving of Technological Change in a Traditional Creative Industry: A Case Study of the Dhokra Artisans of Bankura, West Bengal
David Smith and Rajesh Kochhar

Information and Communication Technologies, Organisations and skills: Convergence and Persistence
Francesco Garibaldo

Back to top


 

Information and Communication Technologies: Perspectives and their Impact on Society
Presented at the EU-India Network Workshop, University of Aachen, June 2000, Revised version to appear in AI & Society, Springer- Verlag, London , 2002

Dietrich Brandt and Klaus Henning
Department of Computer Science in Mechanical Engineering (HDZ/IMA),
University of Technology (RWTH), Dennewartstr. 27, D 52068 Aachen, Germany
Phone: +49 241 96 66 25
Fax: +49 241 96 66 22
Email:Brandt@hdz-ima.rwth-aachen.de

Summary

The most fundamental changes of information exchange and communication in society today have been caused by the fast and thorough penetration of all facets of life through networked computers and mobile phones which both will soon merge with our traditional TV. In this report, these developments will be discussed on four different levels: individuals, groups, organisations and networks. Furthermore contradictory developmental patterns are considered: Global versus Regional Development, Enterpreneurship on different Scales, Data Availability versus Data Security, Reality versus Virtuality, Education, and the Ethics of Multimedia and the Internet

Information and Communication: Past, Present, Future

The most staggering technological developments during the last decades in terms of information and communication have been the wide-spread use of mobile phones and in parallel the networked PCs linked to the web and soon also to be linked to TV. We are expecting these technologies to merge soon into one decentralised mobile network for everybody. These technologies have presently the strongest impact on society world-wide. Hence they will be discussed here in some detail.

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Professional Congress on Information and Communication during the World Engineers` Convention, Hannover, Germany, 19-21 June 2000. The Convention was organised by the German Association of Professional Engineers (VDI). This paper integrates the views and contributions of both the International Programme Committee and the participants of the Congress, as well as its web-based Discussion Group. Furthermore it refers to the work of the Committee on Social Impact of Automation within the International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC), and also the EU-supported Project EU INDIA Cross Cultural Innovation Network.

Back to top


 

Notes for a critical reflection on Emilia-Romagna and Bologna
Presented at the EU-India Network Workshop, University of Aachen, June 2000, Revised version to appear in AI & Society, Springer- Verlag, London , 2002

Francesco Garibaldo
Fondazione Istituto per il Lavoro
Via Marconi 8, I - 40122 Bologna
Email: f.garibaldo@ipielle.emr.it

Summary

In these notes for a critical reflection on Emilia-Romagna and Bologna, a brief description of the most recent developments of regions is given taking into account the impact of global business on regional processes. The example which is the basis for this discussion is the region of Bologna, Italy to analyse these developments, several theoretical concepts are used which reflect the wide-spread commitment of different authors to this common cause of concern.

Recent developments in the Italian region Emilia-Romagna have helped this region to become one of the top ten regions in Europe. The paper discusses the problems and the critical issues that a region whose economy is based upon small and medium enterprises must face today in a scenario of globalisation.

The main problem we have to deal with is a problem of analysis which can be summarised as follows:

Regional society, and Bologna is no exception, being in the leading group of the strong and successful European regions, finds itself going through a typical crisis of maturity. We can distinguish between different historical periods, in a given system such as a sector, a region, etc.. These periods vary from a situation of stability to situations of changes that dynamically readjust the equilibrium, and reach as far as situations of structural dis-equilibrium among the forces at play. In these latter cases we see the crisis of the old model. If we turn our attention to Emilia-Romagna it becomes clear that today’s situation is one of the crisis of maturity and not merely one of adjustment.

To put it differently, there is no convergence between the strategies of the different actors, at every level i.e. macro, meso and micro. Such a convergence is only possible when and if some general values are shared and a certain degree of reciprocal trust can be achieved, and this depends both on the action of government itself and on what is commonly defined as governance. It means a system of government which is based on the presence of many different powers operating autonomously but within the framework of a system of rules and institutions. Such a system allows all the actors, taken as a whole, to define step-by-step and by means of conflicts and negotiations, a dynamic equilibrium of the forces at play. Furthermore, such a convergence largely depends on a set of intermediate institutions and artificially created rules allowing the system to achieve virtuous and viable conditions. This set of intermediate institutions and rules are what I call a ‘new class of public goods’.

I have used the expression strategic convergence consciously to mean that, in my opinion, the crisis of maturity cannot be faced by trusting the regenerative capacities of the system as it is now. In other words, there is no spontaneous solution or, to use a kind of language that is fashionable today, there is no market-led solution to this crisis. It means that we need to follow a pathway of strategic readjustment which must not be dictated and planned by a Big Brother, whether public or private. The pathway to be followed is thus born from the interaction between strong political and cultural projects, as well as from the regional government and the local governments. It also needs to include the social and economic actors who, by means of struggles and breakaways, within a given framework of reference, negotiate and realise a virtuous growth pathway.

The given reference framework is indispensable, in the first place because, as the Nobel prize-winner Amartya Sen (1997) has well argued, there are reasons behind such developments that cannot be traced back merely to economy. It means on the contrary that a problem will become a priority for the simple reason that its non-resolution has the strength to break the whole economic and social framework, thus making policies (which in themselves are reasonable) totally senseless. These priority problems must dictate the economic agenda and not vice-versa. This is what is happening, e.g., through unemployment and social inequality, but this is also true for public order or transport safety.

In the second place, such reference framework is needed because the open nature of the social systems does not imply their total indeterminacy; that is, not every course of action that can be hypothesised is feasible. There are constraints of social and practical coherence. For example, the possibility of great flexibility in the management of the labour resources cohabit with the need to create a knowledge-based society; or else it may result in the non-availability of some of its members - which thus limits the possible courses of action according to coherence frameworks.

Back to top


 

KNOWLEDGE NETWORKING IN CROSS CULTURAL SETTINGS
Presented at the EU-India Network Workshop, University of Aachen, June 2000, Revised version to appear in AI & Society, Springer- Verlag, London , 2002

Karamjit S Gill
School of Information Management
University of Brighton, Brighton BN2 4GJ, UK
Email: k.s.gill@bton.ac.uk

Summary

Knowledge networking in the cross cultural setting here focuses on promoting a culture of shared communication, values and knowledge, seeking cooperation through valorisation of diversity. The process is seen here in terms of creating new alliances of creators, users, mediators and managers of knowledge. At the global level, knowledge networking is about a symbiotic relationship between local and global knowledge resources. This focus is informed by the human centered vision of Information Society, which seeks a symbiotic relationship between technology and society.

It is now widely accepted that our societies are now facing a paradigm shift- a shift from industrial society to post-industrial (information society) and a transition from information society to knowledge society. In this age of the Knowledge Society, it is argued that the knowledge economy replaces the production economy and knowledge becomes a new economic resource. The evolving nature of the meaning of knowledge over centuries signifies the place of knowledge as a crucial determinant in the evolution of societal innovations. Each shift in the meaning of knowledge has coincided with a new innovation, be it an industrial, technological, organisational or social one. This is illustrated in the change in the meaning of knowledge from knowledge as ‘being’ and skill during the pre-industrial era to knowledge as technology during the industrial revolution, to knowledge as 'production resource' during the Productivity Revolution, and to knowledge as 'organisational resource' during the Management Revolution. We have come a long way from knowledge as being a 'private good' to knowledge as being a social and economic 'resource', and a traded commodity. The shift from industrial society to knowledge society changes the nature of the relationship between society, knowledge and technology. This shift affects in a fundamental way the role of ICTs for the distribution of knowledge, the development of network economies, networks of social innovation and networks of co-development.

The notion of co-development here refers to the interdependence between local and global socio-economic systems, and is informed by two human centred notions, subsidiarity and ‘Valorisation’ of diversity The notion of subsidiarity refers to bringing science and scientific knowledge nearer to people with the hope of fostering inter-dependence between the local and the global. The notion of 'valorization' here refers to common/global knowledge networks which build upon the commonalties of local knowledge bases while sustaining local diversities. These notions are rooted in the idea of the symbiosis between human and the machine; between technology and knowledge, and in this particular case a symbiosis between the 'objective' knowledge and the 'tacit' dimension of knowledge. This symbiosis recognizes the essential contribution of the 'objective' knowledge as a global resource for knowledge transfer and development. However, it emphasises that sustainable development depends upon the local capacity for acquiring and interpreting new knowledge and then absorbing the transferred knowledge for practical use within new application contexts. This in turn depends on the level of interdependence between the local knowledge and global knowledge. The notion of the ‘symbiosis’ is intertwined with the dialectical notions of the ‘cause and purpose’ and that of the ‘diversity and coherence’.

At a recent conference in Brighton (Sept. 99), Cooley expressed a deep concern about the way the globalisation is shaping the industrial society towards a machine-centred system in which machines becoming more like people and people becoming more like machines. The time may come when there has to be developed a ‘Turing Test’ so that we can tell one from other. Cooley asserts that we do not require a convergence of the attributes of the machine and the different attributes of a human being but rather we should set out to create a human-machine symbiosis. Symbiosis is central to the discussion on sustainable development. In this developmental perspective, we should view technology or the organisation as a tool rather than a machine. However, for this idea of the symbiosis to take shape we need to question the underlying assumptions of science and technology which is the engine of globalisation, affecting deeply the society in transition from industrial society to knowledge society and in many developing counties from agricultural societies to knowledge societies. We need to be aware of the danger of the two notions of scientific rationality the notion of the ‘one best way’, and the notion of the convergence theory. There is a danger that in following the logic of convergence, we may be tempted to treat diverse and disparate situations with mathematical precision, and make them converge them into a universal entity in the tradition of the one best way. This may lead us to see diversity and the idea of the alternative as hindrance rather than assets to local-global cohesion and interdependent development. The challenge is therefore to develop a human-centred framework for sustainable development based on the valorisation of diversities and seek a harmonious transition to knowledge society.

The human-centred tradition promotes the liberation of human creativity- the pivotal element in liberating the human imagination and creativity. It is crucial that we emphasise what people can do rather than always stating what they can’t do. Cooley points out that we need to recognise that predominantly science and engineering proceeds on the basis of a defect model. In production we are looking at something that is wrong. That permeates through the whole way that we think about it. This destructiveness of always looking at what people can’t do, tend to promote development strategies and solutions in the mechanistic tradition. However, we should recognise that "The futures are out there in the setting of a coastline before someone goes out there to discover it. These are not pre-determined shapes and contours". The futures have yet to be built by us. We do have choices. We can and need to make use of these choices.

Back to top


 

Networks of Science and Technology in India: The Elite and The Subaltern Streams
Presented at the Human Centred Systems Workshop, University fo Brighton, July 2001. Revised vesrion to appear in the AI & Society Journal, Sprinfer Verlag, London, 2002

Dr. Ashok Jain
Emeritus Scientists
Institute of Informatics and Communication
University of Delhi South Campus
New Delhi 110 021, India.
Email: ashokjain_du@yahoo.com
Phones: 91-11-4103938, 6882237
Telefax: 91-11-4103938

Summary

The paper investigates the structure and functioning of the Science and Technology (S&T) system in India as it has evolved in the post-independence period (1947 onwards). The networks of entities involved in S&T actions, the paper argues, can be categorised, in terms of adopted approaches to agenda and priority setting and accounting for actions, in two streams. The origins and expansion of the two streams is traced. One the ‘ Elite’ stream (high profile and visibility linked to big industry) adopting what the paper has generically termed as the ‘Nehruvian’ model of development is shown to have emerged as a dominant network. The other socially powerful ‘Subaltern’ stream (less visible, closer to ground realities and linked to village and cottage industry) adopting the ‘Gandhian’ model of development still remains dispersed and outside the consideration of high level decision making bodies. The paper stresses the importance of moving the support and attention from the dominant stream to efforts that attempt a synthesis between the dominant and the subaltern. This paper discusses the science and technology (S&T) system in India as it has evolved during the post-independence period (1947 onwards). The focus is not on S&T activities per se; it is on the social and cultural dimensions of the system (culture here refers to approaches to issues and priority setting, methods of resolving conflict and so on. Discussion is based on the concept of S&T Innovation Networks (STINs).

Innovation manifests as change and Innovation Networks refer to entities such as individuals, groups, organizations and practices interconnected to cause change towards a purpose. These networks are not of the type one in familiar with say in telecommunications or in railways, they are a mix of humans and non-humans with different sort of identities. The behaviour of these networks in a given social, cultural and economic context gives rise to innovation or change. Individual entities in a network may relate to their own micro-purposes or development agenda. The society at large, however, identifies a network with a common macro purpose. Different networks are viewed as working for different macro purposes.

In India a discourse on macro purposes in the media and other public forums (proxies for articulations by society) usually takes place in terms of the divisions in which the Government articulates the country’s socio-economic development agenda, for example through activities related to industry, commerce, health, education, agriculture etc. Development through S&T activities is one such category of purposes concisely stated in the Scientific Policy Resolutions adopted by the Indian parliament on March 4, 1958.

"The Government of India has decided that the aim of its Scientific Policy will be to foster, promote and sustain by all appropriate means, the cultivation of Science and Scientific research in all its aspects- pure, applied and educational and, in general to secure for the people of the country all the benefits that can accrue from the acquisition and application of Scientific knowledge" (The Scientific Policy Resolution, 1958).

Science and more generally Science and Technology (S&T) being a distinct category of socio-economic purpose, S&T Innovation Networks (STINs) become an identifiable set of networks. The society perceives these networks working for social and economic change through S&T activities. To investigate these STINs we take recourse to a disaggregated representation of the micro purposes of entities constituting these networks. The micro purposes being, contributing to scientific knowledge per se, technological innovations, and promotion of industry or services. Entities involved in these three regimes of micro purposes are interlinked, happenings in one influencing those in the others. In practice, each regime picks up signals of its choice from the other regimes and for legitimisation of resulting actions forms its own supportive constituency

We wish to show that the S&T system in India has gradually grown into two streams. One stream connects the established and institutionalised S&T capabilities to organised industry through entities embedded in a culture generally projected as modern and closer to the practices prevailing in industrialised economies. This stream that is dominant has acquired the character of an elite STIN.

The other stream that we call the ‘subaltern’ stream consists of entities that are dispersed and connect S&T capabilities of smaller groups to distributed and unorganised production units; the term subaltern is adopted from writings on the history of colonialism in India. Entities in this stream are embedded in culture that is sensitive to local community practices. Interconnections between the entities of this stream however are not yet strong enough to be considered as constituting an innovation network.

We shall first explore the genesis of the two streams and then examine the formation of the elite STIN. In the end we shall indicate the possibility of forming a more comprehensive national STIN through synergy between the two streams. It is recognised that the human centred systems movement originating in Europe and the EU-India Cross Cultural Innovation Network project is also concerned with the issue of synergy between the two.

Back to top


 

Entrepreneurial Innovations in Gujarat
Presented at the International Woprkshp/Conference on , GLS, Ahmedabda, December 2002. Revised version to appear in the AI & Society Journal, Springer-Verlag. London, 2002

Dhawal Mehta and Bhalchandra Joshi
Director, GLS Institute of Business Management , Ahmedabad, India.
Email: glsibm@wilnetonline.net
Principal, City Arts College, Gujarat Law Society, Ahmedabad, India.

Summary

Gujarat has been identified as an enterpreneurial hub of India primarily due to innovative behaviour of Gujarati enterpreneurs. This has led Gujarat to be known as a model of enterpreneurial innovations. This model of enterpreneurial innovations has been developed from the study of entrepreneurs in a variety of industries from the region and several industrial clusters of enterprises in Gujarat. The study points to the transformation of many communities, particularly the Patel community which was traditionally an agriculture community into manufacturing class is a new emergent in Gujarat’s industrial scenario.

Gujarat, better known as entrepreneurial hub of India can be considered as a major centre for innovations happening at the grass root level with strong cultural influence. The enterprising behaviour is largely attributed to typical culture comprising of traditions, values beliefs and attitudes of the region and can be of great interest in light of cross cultural innovation model. Gujarat model of entrepreneurial innovation is identified on the basis of innovative behaviour of Gujarati entrepreneurs resulting from their entrepreneurial orientations. The model is developed from the study of entrepreneurs in a variety of industries from the region and several industrial clusters of enterprises in Gujarat.

Gujarat is one of the developed states in India with a population of about 51 million people. It has a strategic location which gives it an easy accessibility to the Western, Middle-East and African markets. It has a longest coastline among all states in India 1600 Kms., dotted with 1 major, 11 intermediate and 29 minor ports. Mundra, a recently commissioned port offers 15 meters of permissible draft, the maximum in India. Gujarat is well equipped with rich heritage of entrepreneurial skill. With a population of about 5 per cent of India, Gujarat accounts for about 10 per cent of India’s gross national product. The co-operative sector in Gujarat has a major share in dairy processing. Gujarat Cooperative Milk Marketing Federation, (Amul) has become a formidable player in the dairy processing with nearly 40 per cent of the market share. This Federation is a major innovation in organisational structure and it successfully competes with major multinationals in dairy products. It breaks a major myth that only private sector is capable of creating a competitive advantage. Amul Ghee, Shrikand or Gulab Jamun is now available in more than 2000 stores in US and U.K. after just eight months of the launch of these products. In 1999, Amul has launched its products in Gulf markets covering Dubai, Oman, UAE, Bahrain, Kuwait, Iraq and Qatar. This is indeed a great achievement for a milk marketing federation of farmers’ co-operative societies .

Back to top


 

Learning Organisations-The Process of Innovation and Technological Change
Presented at the International Woprkshp/Conference on , GLS, Ahmedabda, December 2000. Revised version to appear in the AI & Society Journal, Springer-Verlag. London, 2002

V.P.Kharbanda
National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies
Pusa Gate, K.S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110 012,
Phone: (+91-11)5765380; Fax: 5754640;
E-mail: kharbandavpk@yahoo.com

Summary

In the present scenario of globalisation, knowledge has become the prime factor of production for competitive advantage. This calls for acquisition and utilization of knowledge for innovation and technical change on a constant basis, which is only possible in a ‘Learning Organization’. Innovative activities of a learning organization are influenced by three main factors 1) Internal learning; 2) External learning; and 3) the innovation strategies decided upon by the enterprise management. An assumption has been made that, particularly in developing countries, absorption and adaptation of technologies i.e. indigenization takes place through a process of ‘Learning by Doing’. Taking this into consideration, this paper focuses on a few case studies carried at NISTADS, New Delhi, India, on small enterprises in the formal as well as traditional sector, highlighting the learning process in an organizational context and how it brings in innovation and technological change at enterprise level. The study brings out that learning environment in an organizational context is an indispensable process to be innovative and building up capabilities for technological change. This in turn also calls for strong networking of the enterprises with the academia, R&D institutions, and other enterprises, to create knowledge clusters. This builds up a strong case for network approach of learning organizations not only at the regional level but also at the Cross-Cultural level for constant innovation and technical change.

Over the last few years, knowledge as a prime factor for production and competitive advantage has gained importance. It has become indispensable to maintain competitive advantage through constant innovation and technological change, thereby creating high value added products. This capability to bring in Technological Change (TC) and innovativeness is directly proportional to generating and application of knowledge and thus the enterprises, which excel in this, are also likely to dominate high value added global markets. As generation, acquisition and application of knowledge (both formal as well as tacit) is a continuing process, a ‘learning enterprise’ is likely to lead the race for technological competitiveness.

Technological Change (TC) in an enterprise emanates basically from three sources, i.e., 'learning by doing' process, import of technology and formal R&D. While in developed countries formal R&D is the major input for TC, in developing countries TC occurs mainly through import of technologies and by learning processes, which may be formal or tacit. This is because most of the enterprises in developing countries do not have the capabilities to create frontier technologies/ innovations, which require a well-developed R&D infrastructure. As such this is true for most of the small enterprises particularly in the traditional sector in developing countries including India. These enterprises start off by implementing technologies borrowed from outside, which is followed by incremental changes through the learning process. This learning process takes place at the shop floor of the enterprise through formal or informal communication channels. While the formal communication channels may be through educational training and retraining programmes and official communications with fellow managers or workers, the informal channels may be through communications with the fellow workers or members of the family particularly the parents to tap the more difficult tacit knowledge which may also be not available easily. This kind of learning leading to TC, although incremental, plays a very significant role in overall technical advance and indigenous technology capability building in the small enterprises particularly in the traditional sector in developing countries.

A learning organization must take into account all these activities in order to raise their innovative capabilities. Further, operational capability of these components in a learning organization is dependent on many macro and micro economic variables. The macro economic variables, which are external, include suitable national government policies and various regulation, role of financial institutions and instruments for generation and import of advance technologies. The micro economic variables, which are internal to an enterprise, include formal educational background of the workers, learning by doing, learning environment, training, R&D intensity including financial inputs and entrepreneurial capabilities. These micro-economic variables play a crucial role in constant learning and building up of technological capabilities at the enterprise level. In this context, the basic premise of this study is to focus on a few case studies to explore as to how the small enterprises in the formal sector or artisan groups in the traditional sector in India are transforming themselves into learning organizations to enhance their innovative capabilities to the extent that these could compete effectively in the on-going process of globalisation. This process of learning organizations has been substantiated here by a few case studies taken from the small-scale sector and traditional artisan sector in India

Back to top


 

Entrepreneurial Spirit of the Indian Farmer
Presented at the International Woprkshp/Conference on , GLS, Ahmedabda, December 2000. Revised version to appear in the AI & Society Journal, Springer-Verlag. London, 2002

Kavita Mehra
National Institute Of Science Technology And Development Studies
K.S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110 012, India
email: kavitamehra@yahoo.com
Fax: +91-11 5754640

Summary

The paper highlights entrepreneurial skills of Indian farmers, informal channels of communications in the socio-cultural setting of the village, the tacit knowledge, and factors responsible for the adoption of floriculture in the open field conditions. It illustrates that the diffusion of new technology in a farming community is dependent on culture-based communication and the tacit-knowledge driven entrepreneurial spirit of a few.

Agriculture is the backbone of developing economies. Agricultural development must precede or at least go hand in hand for general economic development. In India, agriculture is the largest economic activity and in the top position in providing work and jobs to people. The main features of Indian agriculture have been the low productivity and backwardness. An attempt to fight out these problems, various programmes have been undertaken by the Government of India. During 1960-61, with the help of Ford Foundation, the ‘Package Programme’ or Intensive Agricultural District Programme (IADP) was initiated in seven districts. During 1964-65, the new policy was put into action when 114 districts were taken up for Intensive Agriculture Area Programme (IAAP) which was for an intensive agricultural development of selected areas. The "New Strategy" for agricultural development was initiated in 1966, which in essence called for the implementation of High Yielding Varieties Programme (HYVP), in all the districts selected under IADP and IAAP schemes. The strategy was concerned with higher productivity of crops per acre, but with multiple cropping.

The Indian Government policies of applying ‘package programme’ give an impression in the literature that the change was technology driven. However, the role of extension services in the agricultural sector, including the involvement of extension workers at the grass root level have also played a crucial role. The diffusion of technology, through networking of research centers and other government institutions with the farmers, has facilitated the success of ‘Green revolution’. The entrepreneurial spirit of farmers can be regarded as a key to this revolution; perhaps they knew the potential of their land and need for the adoption of technology. The response of farmers in the use of HYVs and other inputs had been enthusiastic. They were confident of their tacit knowledge of farming and were willing to capture the opportunity for change.

The Green revolution has been interpreted as the ‘wheat revolution’, since it recorded significant and consistent increase in productivity in case of wheat only. Some impact was of this revolution has been seen on other food grain crops like rice and maize; but not comparable to that on wheat crop. Apart from the impact of New Agricultural Policy on restricted food grain crops, it was restricted to few regions of the country, and was not a solution to the small and marginal farmers. However, the technological change brought a shift in the minds of illiterate but ‘scientifically informed’ farmers, making them realize the importance of high quality seeds and other farming inputs for increasing the productivity of same land. In the Indian history of agriculture, the role of ‘green revolution’ is a landmark as it has made India more than self sufficient in wheat grain production inspite of continuous population growth. After this particular technological change in food grain production, no other organised technological change has been attempted for the common farmer at the Indian Government level. The higher productivity of land gained by adopting HYV seeds of wheat has now produced a saturation in the benefits level to farmers. The ‘alert farmers’ of India have thus remained on the lookout for other opportunities for higher economic returns. Popularity of floriculture sector amongst traditional crop (wheat and sugarcane) growing farmers appears to be one such case during the 1990s. The moment some farmers learnt of the availability of imported bulbs of superior quality flowers and the demand of superior quality cut flowers in the market, they decided to venture into it. Though the focus of Indian government was to promote green house cultivation of flowers for export purpose, Indian farmers went ahead in the business of flower cultivation by themselves without any guidance and experience of growing exotic bulbs in open field conditions. They started with small plots of cultivation for experimentation. Once they succeeded in growing the crop and sell it, they expanded the area of open field cultivation. Most of them by now have devoted major portion of their land to floriculture activity, and some of them have even gone ahead by taking more land on lease for flower cultivation. We can thus say that the farmers have acted as entrepreneurs.

Back to top


 

Role of Universities in IT Education in India
Presented at the IEU-India Network Forum on ICT and Higher Education, University of Delhi, December 2000. Revised version to appear in the AI & Society Journal, Springer-Verlag. London, 2002

Abhai Mansingh
IT in Society Division, Institute Of Informatics & Communication,
South Campus, University Of Delhi
New Delhi 110021
Phone No.7667237
E-mail: abhaymansingh@yahoo.com; smansingh@home.com

Summary

In the wake of information technology revolution, the paper describes the changing role of universities to promote IT education in India to generate qualitative and competitive manpower in the face of mushrooming of private institutions in the field of IT. The rapid growth of private teaching initiatives reflects inadequacies of the public educational system to the need of emerging IT environment, especially considering the high prices charged by the private training. It is pointed out that the emerging knowledge society and the economy is not going to be based on IT alone, but it will depend on the development of both infotech as well as basic research in domain areas. Any policy on IT education should ensure that basic disciplines are not to be ignored. Universities should develop new and innovative programmes for students from different basic disciplines to give training for high-end jobs. To promote IT education a new innovative concept of earning while learning has been introduced recently. Highlights some of the initiatives started by Delhi University to modify / improve the course programmes for IT education looking at the needs of the industry.

The invention of the tiny transistor in 1948 has truly transformed human society today. That invention gave birth to a new era of electronic machines based on transistors and resistors of which today’s computer are only the most recent manifestation. These fifty odd years have witnessed a speed of technological transformation that almost defies imagination. Indeed, today’s computers compare to their progeny half-a-century ago like human beings compare to apes, from whom we evolved several thousands of years ago.

The recent convergence of the capabilities of modern computers with telecommunications has further revolutionized the technology for Information Communication and Storage (popularly called Information Technology). As a result, any computer of a network today can access information stored in any other networked computer anywhere else in the globe (the Internet). One indicator of the speed of technological developments in this area is the fact that time on the internet is often measured in "Web-years" - four of which make one calendar year!

It comes as no surprise that this phenomenal technological change has been so rapid that the society has not yet been able to fully understand and absorb it and its implications. This is true not just in developing countries like India but also in industrialised countries where the penetration of computer technology into the society is far deeper. In fact, based upon the experience of industrialized countries, there are strong grounds to believe that we are still witnessing only the tip of the proverbial iceberg as regards implications of the new technologies both at an economic level as well as at broader levels of society and culture.

The rapid technological changes -- poorly comprehended by even educated people in our society -- along with large-scale wealth creation and commercial dynamism in the Information Technology (IT) sector are raising critical challenges for our universities and the education system. These include commercial exploitation of students and individuals ill-informed of the new technologies, declining importance of the basic sciences in our educational output, and a virtual marginalisation of the university system in the explosive growth of the IT sector. Each of these is detrimental to our society in the long run. How should universities, with their special role in society, react to these challenges, and what role can the University Grants Commission(UGC) and other government agencies play in developing a meaningful response to these challenges is the subject matter of this paper.

Back to top


 

An Indigenous process of pedagogic innovation: a case study on curriculum development
Presented at the IEU-India Network Forum on ICT and Higher Education, University of Delhi, December 2000. Revised version to appear in the AI & Society Journal, Springer-Verlag. London, 2002

Pratibha Jolly
Department of Physics, University of Delhi, Delhi, India 110 007
Tel: 91-11-7666804 (work)/91-11-6212289 (home)
email: pjolly@vsnl.com

 

Summary

We describe our attempts at curriculum development at the undergraduate level working within the constraints of a large traditional university system. Curriculum reform is described as a three-step process of product innovation, accommodation and assimilation. In a dual pronged strategy, students are constructively engaged in investigative projects and assigned specific tasks for one, giving them a flavor of creative research and two, development of curricular products. The process of transfer of pedagogic innovations into the formal classrooms is enhanced by a teacher training program that aims to provide experiential learning of research-based innovative teaching practices, catalyze process of reflection through classroom research and establish a collaborative network of teachers.

Nowhere are the contradictions in India more evident than in the state of its science education; nowhere the challenges more. On one side, the nation revels in the spectacular advances it has made in the field of science and technology, the competence of its scientific manpower, the creativity and native intelligence of its people. On the other side, classrooms with the distinction of producing the third largest scientific work force in the world lie in a state of morass. Barring few exceptions, tertiary classrooms even in premium colleges and universities cannot withstand scrutiny. Science education in India has by and large stood immanently frozen at its historically traditional roots even five decades after independence. Overstressed by the sheer number of students, infrastructure deficiencies and support services, most institutes have little motivation to ponder over intricacies of curriculum development and quality in education. A nation on the move, however, cannot rest its laurels on accomplishments of its prodigious few. It needs formal education systems that unleash, nurture and sustain the inherent talent of its burgeoning masses to ensure large scale change and quality input in all facets of its development.

Altering inert educational systems with firmly entrenched practices is a complex task. A community act, it involves many actors. At the outset, it requires an honest appraisal of objectives, the learning environment and criterions that assess learning outcomes. Alternate plans need structural changes, new curriculum materials, teaching strategies, instruments for assessment, mechanisms for dissemination and pilot trials. All this can not be done in isolation from the key players: the students and the teachers. Thus the foremost requirement for ushering change is an understanding of the social dynamics of human development.

In this paper we describe our experiences in developing alternate teaching scenarios working within the constraints of a large traditional university system. The emphasis is not as much on the theoretical details of materials developed as on the processes of innovation and change. To better portray the magnitude of the task first we outline the ecological framework of our university and describe its set of practices. Then we trace the evolution of our work within the larger perspective of one, curriculum development and two, professional development of teachers as a community of action researchers.

Back to top


 

Convergence, the University of the Future and the Future of the University
Presented at the EU-India Network Workshop, Bologna/Urbino May 2001. Revised version to appear in the AI & Society Journal, Springer-Verlag. London, 2002

David Smith
School of Art, Media and Design
University of Wales College, Newport
Email: david.smith@newport.ac.uk

Summary

This paper deals with some of the education and training issues which arise from the Council of Europe Culture Committee Draft Recommendation on Cultural Work. It commends the general tenor of the document, and in particular its attempts to chart some future career trajectories. However, it argues that the draft itself is incomplete without explicit reference to art. The role of the arts in relation to the Cultural Industries is discussed with specific reference to Wales and the Welsh economy. One set of possible fusions of Art and Technology are illustrated by reference to digital arts courses in the University of Wales College, Newport.

The paper questions the ability of the current university system to respond appropriately to the complex demands of an Information Economy. It argues that the new relationships between creative subjects and technology implicit in the Draft Recommendation require new thinking about the nature and purpose of universities per se. In particular, attention is drawn to the growing involvement of the private sector in higher education. It is argued that it may not be appropriate to think of the ‘university of the future’ in terms of current public sector and quasi public sector institutions, but rather in terms of an emporium, based on an international trade in educational services, and with the ‘University’ as we now understand it occupying the functions of licensing, quality assurance and cultural custodianship.

Back to top


 

Multimedia Archiving of Technological Change in a Traditional Creative Industry: A Case Study of the Dhokra Artisans of Bankura, West Bengal
Prepared for R &D project on Multimedia and Artisan Enterprise of the EU-Indian Innovation Network project. Revised version to appear in the AI & Society Journal, Springer-Verlag. London, 2002

David Smith
School of Art, Media and Design, University of Wales College, Newport
PO Box 179 Newport NP18 3YG UK

Email: david.smith@newport.ac.uk

Rajesh Kochhar
NISTADS (National Institute of Science, technology and Development Studies)
KS Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110012, India
Email: rkk@nistads.res.in

Summary

This article deals with a process of technological change in the traditional cire perdue (dhokra) brass-making craft as it is practised by one group of families in Bikna Village, near Bankura in West Bengal, India. This change was initiated and coordinated by the Indian CSIR (Council for Scientific and Industrial Research) agency NISTADS (National Institute for Science, Technology and Development Studies). It involved replacing an ancient traditional but inefficient metal-foundry technique with another which is almost as ancient but more efficient. The impact of this apparently simple change on the dhokra practice has been both profound and rapid.

Research and development carried out at UWCN suggests that that multimedia technologies make it possible to develop adequate representations of skilled performance mediated by the craftsman him- or herself. Particularly valuable in this respect is the capacity of multimedia systems to use a full range of modalities of description, including video, sound, still image, conventional text and technical diagrams. This technology makes it possible to present very complex information in a variety of formats and contexts. The study is therefore part of a wider exploration of the potential capability of multimedia as a tool for ethnographic research.

The name ‘Dhokra’ or ‘Dokra’ was formerly used to indicate a group of nomadic craftsmen, scattered over Bengal, Orissa and Madhya Pradesh in India, and is now generically applied to a variety of beautifully shaped and decorated brassware products created by the cire perdue or ‘lost wax’ process. The craft of lost-wax casting is an ancient one in India, and appears to have existed in an unbroken tradition from the earliest days of settled civilisation in the sub-continent. The traditional themes of these cast metal sculptures include images of Hindu or ‘tribal’ gods and goddesses, bowls, figures of people or deities riding elephants, musicians, horse and rider figures, elephants, cattle, and other figures of people, animals, and birds.

There has never been a detailed audio-visual record of the craft, and this current report aims to fill this gap in the record. It documents a period during which the people of Bikna are adapting their traditional way of working to the demands and possibilities both of a new technology and a new commercial environment. It therefore provides a unique contemporary record of a historic living tradition undergoing rapid and fundamental change.

Although there is a small but increasing demand for dhokra work from urban Indian families, as well as in the tourist trade, the craft is threatened with extinction. Most of the remaining dhokra communities are extremely poor, and their economic condition has caused many families to leave the craft to find wage employment in local manufacturing centres or in metropolitan centres such as Kolkata (Calcutta).

Back to top


 

Information and Communication Technologies, Organisations and skills: Convergence and Persistence
Prepared for the R &D Activity on Multimedia and `Cultural Industrries of the EU-Indian Innovation Network project. Revised version to appear in the AI & Society Journal, Springer-Verlag. London, 2002

Francesco Garibaldo
Fondazione Istituto per il Lavoro
Via Marconi 8, I - 40122 Bologna
Email: f.garibaldo@ipielle.emr.it

Summary

This article, first of all, supports the idea that the undeniable process of ICT based technological convergence implies the social, cultural and business unification of the world of media and culture. The poor performance of the megamerger is a clear indicator of the unstable ground of the convergence hypothesis. Secondly it argues in favor of co-operation between different expertises, skills and cultures to make multimedia products or to supply multimedia services, instead of creating from scratch a brand new class of hybrid skills and professions. Thirdly a variety of new possible and realistically achievable professional profiles in cultural industries and institutions are illustrated. Eventually a set of public policies, in the light of a new role for cities and regions, are developed.

My starting points are firstly, the very low political status of a public discussion more concerned with the labour implications of ICT than its business or technological aspects and secondly, the risk of purely reactive policies in this field. This perspective implies a critical analysis of three main issues concerning globalisation, convergence and new organisational patterns. The reason why this article will re-examine the key point of the actual international debate, namely the convergence hypothesis, is that a strong bias over this key analytical point can be found in strong technologically-based policies as those presented in the Green Paper on Convergence issued by the European Commission (1998).

Back to top




This site is co-financed by the European Commission

Disclaimer